<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dopplr for developers: &#8220;it&#8217;s made of messages&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/</link>
	<description>News, discussion and design chat about Dopplr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: solid Python queueing? / taint.org: Justin Mason's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link>
		<dc:creator>solid Python queueing? / taint.org: Justin Mason's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dopplr.com/?p=309#comment-4341</guid>
		<description>[...] message queueing has become insufferably trendy. You don&#8217;t need to tell me, I&#8217;ve known it&#8217;s the bees knees for 4 years now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] message queueing has become insufferably trendy. You don&#8217;t need to tell me, I&#8217;ve known it&#8217;s the bees knees for 4 years now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dopplr.com/?p=309#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt,

Thoroughly enjoyed the talk. For me, and also for one of my developers, it was one of the most important talks of the conference. It&#039;s certainly made my team think more about designing for a multi-server architecture before we actually have a multi-server architecture.

It seems that a lot of the talks and sessions at FOWA had one of two common themes this year - dealing with growing pains or how the economic crisis is affecting our industry - both very hot topics. The former was far more interesting of course, but also had some interesting influences on the latter.

As an example, I built our main data processing system with scalability in mind (I&#039;ve always been a fan of the whole &quot;small things, loosely coupled&quot; idea) and it means that by doing so, when the time finally does come around to scale up, it won&#039;t cost you hours (or days, or weeks) in re-designing your system to cope.

Once again, thanks for the insightful talk - I hope to catch more of your presentations over the coming year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Thoroughly enjoyed the talk. For me, and also for one of my developers, it was one of the most important talks of the conference. It&#8217;s certainly made my team think more about designing for a multi-server architecture before we actually have a multi-server architecture.</p>
<p>It seems that a lot of the talks and sessions at FOWA had one of two common themes this year &#8211; dealing with growing pains or how the economic crisis is affecting our industry &#8211; both very hot topics. The former was far more interesting of course, but also had some interesting influences on the latter.</p>
<p>As an example, I built our main data processing system with scalability in mind (I&#8217;ve always been a fan of the whole &#8220;small things, loosely coupled&#8221; idea) and it means that by doing so, when the time finally does come around to scale up, it won&#8217;t cost you hours (or days, or weeks) in re-designing your system to cope.</p>
<p>Once again, thanks for the insightful talk &#8211; I hope to catch more of your presentations over the coming year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4318</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dopplr.com/?p=309#comment-4318</guid>
		<description>Matt, thanks for giving us such an wonderful message. i would really like to discuss the topic in more depth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, thanks for giving us such an wonderful message. i would really like to discuss the topic in more depth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nilesh</title>
		<link>http://blog.dopplr.com/2008/10/10/dopplr-for-developers-its-made-of-messages/comment-page-1/#comment-4312</link>
		<dc:creator>Nilesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dopplr.com/?p=309#comment-4312</guid>
		<description>Cheers Matt - I really, really enjoyed the talk. One of the best moments of FOWA, I&#039;ll definitely starting thinking about this elegant approach from now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Matt &#8211; I really, really enjoyed the talk. One of the best moments of FOWA, I&#8217;ll definitely starting thinking about this elegant approach from now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

